Everyone in the field knows. Its a free world right now. Its oversee by the people (birds), and of course its the people's interests they got sued at. In that term a lot of the money goes to supporting the lawsuit process, or the court room structure of the local jurisdiction to every governmental branches.
They can also doing that. One department suing another. Its all under the constitution, they find it, the argument is theirs.
No, not me. No. Money? At them. The judge gives to that 2 Party whichever whom sueing at. It will be the prosecutor inquisitive the whole situation, so that Party whom put the prosecutor to prosecuting the case, that Party won, then the compensation goes to that prosecutor and the Party.
I got? Zero dollar.
Correct, strictly saying that is their own efforts, it will be zero dollar. I keep saying it.
NO!!! I say that thousand time NO! or Million TIMES NO!
Princess Diary those court room scene the Queen and the Congress? That is Biden's job. No, not me. But but but, I have heard the smallest nation used to be 26 people? There was, and they....?! Me, no. Definitely NEVER that. I have the whole sky heavenly military, oh no. Never that. Of course not.
Is that an argument? NO! Its NOT comprisable !!!!
I think you got mix up, really. You don't force me to put an argument in it. The court room justice in the democracy world to the judge means, you know what you are doing. If that is unfair, you can bring up the argument, the judge will decide. I SAY NO!
Correct, they do that from behind too. The day I was born. Not now. 40 years ago. 41 years ago. Their job supposes to simulating all that, to say a professional job, how it supposes to be done = a real MD. Not one thing got done.
Birds say Ronan. The Earthquake, or the Sisterhood of the Travel Pants. Of course not.
The argument is not a random thought process. Did you even at least pick up a book and read it the words how they phrase? If I reading those books, I might be coming out of a different thing starting 801.
No, you are not supposed to be red mark by me. That is against the law, true. I think the court room, they will take you all out. Anything of that. I keep saying no, that is everyone outside. Jail or kneel, that kinds. No, not about me. They are the criminal in the regular civilian zone. Me will be an excuse you triggering all that. You are the criminal fence barring out of the society. For real. That is very very bad.
If I don't show up that UB classroom, its every one being investigated until dead. I show up. Correct, you walking to be put on the criminal list. You are harming me directly at the judge's face. Theft next action its to kill. Its everyone knows that. Its a criminal murder trial case. You one walking in, they investigate 1000 facebook on my name list, including the organic channel.
I assuming, that is what they would do. I assuming.
Prince Harry will go to jail again, if that book written exactly I say with the evidence. The publisher and the book vendors with him, all goes to the jail. Including that Meghan. She helps him I think someone says that book. SPARE.
One Lawsuit 275, its their beginning to the ending of every hell, ETERNAL. Anyone near there.
Forever.
I talking like I don't know. The first argument a lot of people hating anyone in anything those.....they can hate me too.
But those are the money to those people. They put through, part of the money is me. Part of they know becoming their pocket money. That is the democracy and a part of the court room activities delicate to that.
Its forever in the abyss of hell, worse than hell.
You never seen those arguments, right? You don't even know what I written in there, 275, 276, 277...because its 800+ liability, they got sue 8 billions time. That is what it is. They only deny their responsibility.
They deny
They deny
They deny
They deny
They deny
So what's next step? haha.....
Correct, I didn't file the direct lawsuit to them. The American government did on that one David Jones. I say that is his father. 2019? He was the David Jones.
Those are not the lawsuit content? Those are all the arguments contents.
So you don't get those money? The prosecutor knows how to spin that, they got those money. No, not me. The liability part. You only get the content creation those parts? Correct. Its the evidence from the movies. Its....a kind of like the evidence. You don't understand the court room to see a judge? If side by side, that is the argument inside with the evidence people see it....anyone sue them, its those people's money. They say......they know how to do that. I give them to the public online, its free from my side, they go and fix that.
I get from that share if the judge put that on the side. No, not at them. They quote from my documents. Too much, so they sorting that later.
They are inside the business, these people none of you will know their faces, their company name, their floor, their logo, their business behind one words. They take a car, they take a flight, you don't know whom this people are. Its inside their business case, or just the regular backpack. You never know whom they are. What you gonna do? Kidnap them, asking for your money? Its their money. I keep saying that.
But they are using my arguments?
My claim, almost like the picture I see, I know....or I deducted a logic as....I put through a saying....they gone to a certain procedure and find out, they relocated that argument, just one part of that, or all of it. They can do all that on their own.
I got no paid? No. They carry through, its theirs money. A lot of people willing to do that. They know how to do that, so they go to these river stream pollution cases, you seeing on the movies, that is the justice people willing to do.
If every case they won? That is their money. Of course.
I got no penny? No! They put in a different argument. The court will settle my side, correct. That is might be the original classify all that bundle together. So far, if you can do that, ....technically you have 1 millions lawyers/ law firms / law attorney to all using my 800+, if you get up side by me, to generate exactly what I do, 2 cases, they take it immediately, you rise up.
To the democracy world, you say you being spot your talent, you can immediately rise up. Any kind of the logic. Me doing this inductive logic or fallacy later later later.....
That later coming it out.
Is that the money? YES.
But you stop. Correct.
Is that the money?
I told the truth, there is something......so as that put through, soon I stopped all that. Whatever the indicator too soon. So...if I was alive, they will put it together with everyone falls off, its on the real time. I used to keep saying that to them. But, if I was dead, right, they just mourn and deal all that later, its written it down. They compensate to my family. My mother.
So all of that gone through?
Yes.
But they are not the lawsuit.
No.
They know I written like that, no one will write like that.
Is that good or bad?
In answering you the clear puzzle to the box, to say Jack in the box, or the cracker of the nutshell, without the shoes, the music box and a clown. If were saying the earlier prevention to the later presumption, there is that debates going on through....
entourage
This is not Together We Are Family, or Together We Are Strong?! "
No comments:
Post a Comment