A note falls off ....the original claim is the original file.

You wrote that, or the judge writes another?

Something drop by my neighbor. The free falling outside the cliff, that scene?! (the birds agree)  What about this movie plots inside that is an actual story? That is not a true story, everyone knows that. What about it?

"In the defining an actual story that was based upon no true reality, that scene we brought forwards in ...."

That is your description, right?  Then, you write....???! What do you want to claim?

(the birds throats)

You mean the Backstreet Boy, the lyrics on "free falling"?  (their throats keep going)

Simon, Loving the Silent Tear?  

In the party that involved as the none blood related.....indirect claim to those Party might involved as Party A or Party S or Party B, in the precedence of that claim (before this paragraph) 

(no, not Simon? The birds keep throat....Thor?! Prince William or the King, not stopping. )

rhythm different, Queen!! (Kitchen side gu gu gu birds). Middleton? My right 4th finger hurts.

Camilla !

The left side stop, the right side continue gu gu gu ....her daughter?! 

(Shut up~)

None of these are relevant !!!! To any of this you make up them party, you cannot involuntary pulling someone's you have zero or will ever be imaginative to pull to the court by the pure imagination saying that. Those are not the claims. Those are the imagination, you suppose to tell your lawyers, these are the imagination?!

You mean ....

Other than the written, pin points down those statement files, your photo, and the aging such as one of those factors? Do you mean the public validating those account by they themselves or their accord to the judge? I keep hearing these, do you mean like the judge told all of you the same, or there is this Princess Diary 2,.....or that is ( the judge has to re-modified?)

Eraser....Asian we have the pencil and the eraser cute those kinds.....usually the adult we use the pen.

This 4th finger keep hurting.

You mean you ask !!!

To that the discern points where these arguments go, where "you here prefer" to address the Party such as the entity we label here as_______ to the story inside the character such as _______  we have this alternation to where my belief were in the true setting the school period of time during ________ to ________ but we variation of that alternating...roles, we are not sure.

You just mean you write the paragraph ?

You making a statement, what you believe and piles up the evidence.

 

Me and Dean never talked about it, I am so....dizzy. I don't even have the ITune for these things, the story was something about the gate open and the gate close, the song, or the freezing storm, the glove, or the one door parts 2 worlds. The song or play the snowman when we were small. 

You put the argument with their deceased mother and Camilla you used to know Prince Charles all history book? From the 90s, 80s, those?

I say that again.

If my youtube is not filled up with Westlife, and I voluntary did those facebook NOT because my entire youtube and the entire facebook is nothing but their faces.....during any court paper saying, we have no previous connection whatsoever, I "voluntary" claim to be, or pulling that person's life without his consent will, to move into these motion pictures to pretending Dean and me we were the real lab partner actually talked to.....in English.

None of those are valid, you ever asked your lawyer? Never put that on the paper at all.

Correct, you delete the entire England flag, you have to re-start, with your lawyers modifying that 10 years ago, re-starting all over again. This time......you say its any flag or without the flags search of these princess tales, no set footprint, never that England, no. You just tell the judges no. That is impossible. You want to re-claim all over again, must re-starting, without this England, its all wrong.

Its ANY noted current flagged countries in the UN or none-UN member, you wish a re-start searching since 10 years ago, you want to nullify the 10 years ago. You should have never put the England flags in it, its less chance, and its not focus to the none- other flagged countries. You only focus on the England that nation. You mean 199 countries, not 1 England. 

Am I sure?

Yes, I am very very sure, you can just ask the lawyer. It must re-start 10 years ago, re-open, or re-fileing. 

You mean you are some kinds of the guru?  (Birds....they are)

I am so blind, I cannot see it.

There is a Heaven ingredient in it, is that you newly added in? Anything other than you using my material next by and added, you are replacing me? That is a crime, you never say any of that. You only write what I write. Most time won't go through, but...you look prettier among the none photo reasons when you get to the DC. 

Right, if you are all collectively got told the same things, something I think I did heard. Its just you probably didn't get to those a lot more professional lawyers, the original claims. This kinds of the files....it was wrong.

England will never be the guru at all. So you saying if you re-start, or re-formatting something the correct words 10 years ago, these added session? Its not relevant, you have a discussion session? Or you all file like 2 or 3 lawsuits, like that? You file 1 I think its sufficient.

You got those birds video things wrong? The new bird those calling the phone video? The chair? You just keep updating these current my website stuffs, how often? 10 years never stop?  The Earth doesn't have a heaven's chair. The classify will listen that doesn't mean anyone or anything has that real validating Earth account. If you dare to go through classify, that isn't a claim thing but they can find out, or the judge willing to go through that classify and the judge he or herself capable to ask. If the judge is not willing, you can not make the judge. You all surely make the hell of the judge's life, I can tell you. He or she you enemy her all the time.

No, the court doesn't given this account, you are the Earthly mortal these kinds of the words or the celestial the immortals, meaning you will not die. everyone dies.

You just want to aim for this year, page 394? It doesn't exist, you want to come back in 2 years, and re-think. Do your jobs, go to work, and you know this is possible or half hearted, or yelling back and forth with the judges, literally screaming to that person?

You censor the movies for a file, that is the best you got?

Meaning you break the movies in a different piece to connecting the files you wish to convey, that isn't the movie says, but you push to becoming your say, by triggering the lawsuit. You never ask the movie industry why they don't file behind just the indicate person got notified in the year of 2014, they make everyone in confusion. You could have done better with the judge by first triggering that call is to confront someone face-to-face in the court room in 2014.

If you don't?

Are they dead?

You are triggering the court to.....do what?

And why don't you go to the President, just hand it to you? The court room function its to trigger....these types of the files, the first unheard of. 

I personally will tell you, you never do those cutting the frame of these....you pick-and-choose for this movies idea stuffs and submit that in the court. They found out 1.....you all finished on the year 2014, all of it.  Any story telling, you didn't investigate it, to cut and paste....you damage both your career and those whomever...near by.

I know, those per frame, like many per photo. You didn't attract the inspectors to find out what those mean, that is what I would say. If any of those got trigger, are the inspectors jobs. You never asked.

You are not careful....so a lot of these details in the 2014, the first step. You or many...you count how many, that is without me. And I knew those per step, and someone else found out, that is per steps 100% accurate, you all be doom?!

No, you don't care if you are doom with the judges, but that is another person in front of you. 

You don't care about a lot of things, you are ruined it on the year 2014, all together. You didn't process it right. Some people knew exactly what those are. 

What you supposed to be doing, if you are smart. You go to Wing and help him pretending the best friend of it, he got so many these file, and you tested water when he is around and through him. Those smaller voice ruins his file by his own hands, but listens to what he found out what that supposes to mean, you will do everything possible not to enter the court room to step the first thread wrong. Its all wrong wrong wrong to me. 

When you redundantly to keep censor the movies for a story.....that is very very bad. 

That is not a court case, that is to censor the framed stories into some fragment of written-up middle school copy paste to make a paste book to "enter the court room" in hoping to see a judge. Do you know his name? Have you two met before? Any home address similar near by?

Maybe take it to the law librarian, get every word clear from what I said, I don't know which law librarian you ever console. 

I go to sleep.

These kinds of the conversation, you suppose to..... 

Find out where you can get these I written them every details of it, your President is the daughter millions 24 hours best, I think that is the story. I hope he is a licensed lawyer.