Let's say the court room arguments, what can we literally put it down on the piece of paper?

You first talk to the lawyer, those are all legal. You always tell the judge, you have consult with a lawyer will sound prepare in advance before you seeing a judge.

Does the judge know to write piece of paper?

YES!

And if we ask the judge, is that legal?

Of course its legal.

Because the judge is the lawyers?

Yes.

Not against us?

NO.

I don't think the judge agrees with us, is that against us, to put it down on the paper, and he denies it.

Then, that is correct. He is correct. He is the judge. That is correct.

Does the judge must be correct each and every time?

Yes, he got hired on the jobs.

You mean we can just ask the judge, what does he want to read from us, those count, right?

Yes!

Can we ask the lawyer?

Yes.

And then the judge?

Yes, but you can just ask the lawyer, you fear, so you ask the judge.

Are they suppose to know the same thing on these files?

Yes.

Does the lawyer know why the judge deny or dismiss it?

Yes.

Can you deny someone's heritage right to say lost the whole kingdom to that trillion dollar?

The lawyer will tell you, no. It doesn't exist. Not like that.

If we ask the judge?

He will deny it.

Every time?

Every single time.

You know, your arguments are not one thing we can use? Did you say those System lawyers are using it?

Your arguments are nothing sustain, you don't need to look at mine.

What do you mean the argument, the first sentence of the first claim, that is after the background story?

Its best your lawyer writes it for you, and when you took him there by the lawyer fee. Only he talks. He knows what you want, and only talk in what you want.

But I want to write what I want?

You except my claim those, whichever paragraph without knowing that is an argument? 

Correct.

And you copy one sentence, or the whole documents? 

No, not the whole documents?

It has to be the whole document, the judge understands me.

If I cut in the segament.

The moment you open your mouth, or you insert any any any your original words in it, the judge will know, that is not the original claim. You took it from somewhere and you want to argue that, but none of that is sustain.

That means wrong?

You cannot write it, your lawyer must write it. You put the venting words in it. Its an intellectual debates. 

News.