Which file is the original file?

The one you given to the judge, he or she agrees with you to go forth.

I mean 10 years ago.

The one you and your lawyer filed.

What suitcase Shane hold it, you know? (lower his head, you smoking or what you eating the hard candy?)

That is Hank, Harry.

Are you sure the movie is not about these original file?

Where are you now? Its the night market time, or me going to sleeping time? Maybe I call Nicky asking him ....where is Shane's what suitcase?

The beewax means?

Looks identical women ....Harry Potter, one or another either survive, that is the original file?

Tuesday night, drink ! 

Y Uk E, the stairs to entwine....Jack & the Beans? He cannot climb up too fat?

You cannot file the different movies to claim the different, "The One", you mean? You and your brother, that kind?  You mean you had too many movies, to claim ONE, that is what you mean? Which one is the original? They are all original. 

The first one you file, that one. I understand now.

You file every year of those movie?

The first one you file for Harry Potter would be the book or the movie? That year went through, if the judge agrees, that is the original.

2014, that year, if the judge let you through, that is the original.

Not related? No.

I don't think you do that kinds of the things, right? 

You are sunglasses shade at your own 1 person home seat with a suitcase hold tight to your chest.

This is not about when you say OU, inside those words,

The original, you use that in the court, to say....which one of you is the original Harry Potter?

No, that is not what I mean. Your written inside things that the judge pass it to the next level. If its just verbally told, that is not file-ing.

You want me to say that again?

You can only claim the things as "the movie content"

or "the movie implies."

Are they different? Yes.

Okay, I tell you in general, because too many movies, relax. Let's say 25 years?  Does that written forms, your lawyers and you agree and the judge says okay, she or he looks into it. That is the original file, and what does the lawyer helps you written in it, or that with your father consent all together in it.

That "associate movie inside implied name" or "the title from which century time" or "a particular location" imply that movie story might be REAL.

Do you always need to be specific?

Depends on your claim because you find out why, and your lawyer helps you to write that. The movie makes you believe that is related inside your life, so you be specific to ask the judge to WHICH term, you want to associate in the investigation. If that file-ing successful, the judge agrees 25 years ago, you are okay, he or she will look for you, and that's it. That is the original file. The judge can tell you, that doesn't exist.

If people just use that words, is that against my file-ing?

No.

You sure?

I am sure.

Are we just all guessing which terms or condition to write in the lawsuit?

None of them have a brain, so they ask the lawyer, so its the lawyer just not to trigger the judge's anger I can tell you that. That...

They know or we know we are doing that, doing it?

Your lawyer can only being consoled by you. The real smart human whom really done this lawsuit in the claim to say pass the judge to imagine....out smart the judge.....I am not sure what to tell you.

You would do by how?

I am not doing anything !

But 2 posts ago those explaination if were to be specific, you would do that if you claim to guess through or file through?

You understand what the judge wish to say, when that goes very very needie greedie of that per frame per name, per file icon, to per character inside the movie, you be very careful to tell the judge, you understand that per word per term, per looks, per story plot around that character IS YOU. 

We cannot be specific, because we don't know.

Your lawyer probably tell you, you better not to do that, that sounds fishy.

Correct.

That is not the first time you file in the court room, right? Other than the joint files 20 years ago, at all? 

No, I have filed others on my own.

Me would be zero. That can impress to the judge the first file-ing of that person. The normal circumstance its the people don't like to lawsuit. 

You have too many competition, is that why?

That will be one reason be a lot more clear and be specific. 

You done that before?

No.

How do you know?

I want to go to sleep, not hanging on here. I given you exactly everyone hears the same.

You are just very sure that is supposed to be done like that?

Correct, you didn't let the judge knows very deeply, you actually check per line inside the movie around that character to what it implies when you using the movie content as itself to claim. 

I got very dizzy and mix up whenever you mix all this things and said.

I know.

I just want to get through.

You need to be better at the lawyer when you research on your own, and you "use the lawyer" to guide him in it. You all doing the opposite of it.

You just boss the lawyer to do it.

Correct.